As business leaders, we often find reassurance in statements like: “We are DPDP compliant” or “We passed our ISO/SOC audit.” However, the uncomfortable truth is that compliance does not equate to security.
Some of the largest cyber incidents, both globally and in India, have occurred in organizations that were fully compliant on paper. The Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act in India is a significant advancement, providing clarity on data fiduciary accountability, consent management, breach notification obligations, and imposing penalties totalling hundreds of crores. Yet, it's crucial to remember that DPDP is a legal framework, not a security architecture.
DPDP prompts the question: “Have you implemented reasonable safeguards?” but it does not inquire about:
A DPDP policy document will not prevent ransomware, nor will a consent notice stop identity abuse. Many organizations find themselves in the Compliance Comfort Zone:
In the meantime:
Attackers do not focus on compliance gaps; they exploit security gaps. Instead of merely asking, “Are we compliant?” we should consider:
While compliance is necessary, security is essential for survival. The most resilient organisations:
Compliance helps you pass audits. Security helps your business stay alive.
Audit-ready is good. Attack-ready is essential.